Default Style Register
Daycare.com Forum
Daycare Center and Family Home Forum>Rsv
Unregistered 02:28 PM 02-13-2017
I have an almost 6 month old who was diagnosed with RSV on Saturday. He is not here today. Mom texted saying that he seems better today and is planning on bringing him tomorrow if I am okay with it. She said he has a nebulizer in case he starts wheezing. 😯 Has anyone dealt with this kind of situation before and if so, what is your policy on returning to care? I have never had a child who has had RSV or who has needed a nebulizer while in care before. Looking for some advice. Thanks!
Reply
Blackcat31 02:35 PM 02-13-2017
Originally Posted by Unregistered:
I have an almost 6 month old who was diagnosed with RSV on Saturday. He is not here today. Mom texted saying that he seems better today and is planning on bringing him tomorrow if I am okay with it. She said he has a nebulizer in case he starts wheezing. 😯 Has anyone dealt with this kind of situation before and if so, what is your policy on returning to care? I have never had a child who has had RSV or who has needed a nebulizer while in care before. Looking for some advice. Thanks!
http://www.hennepin.us/-/media/henne...fact.pdf?la=en

That is the technical fact sheet my state's health department hands out.

Personally I would NOT take a child that needs a nebulizer during the day. That would mean he/she is not back to 100% and I don't accept kids into care that can't participate 100% as normal.

Taking time to give him/her a neb treatment (possibly more than once during the day) requires atleast 10-15 minutes and that takes time and attention from the others.

Other provider's may do it differently but that's my 2 cents.
Reply
daycare 02:42 PM 02-13-2017
I agree with BC
I just had a 2.5 year old with it and she was out 8 full days, which included weekend. She came back last week and I sent the hold home for unable to participate.

RSV is very contagious and dangerous for infants.
Reply
LysesKids 03:05 PM 02-13-2017
Originally Posted by Blackcat31:
http://www.hennepin.us/-/media/henne...fact.pdf?la=en

That is the technical fact sheet my state's health department hands out.

Personally I would NOT take a child that needs a nebulizer during the day. That would mean he/she is not back to 100% and I don't accept kids into care that can't participate 100% as normal.

Taking time to give him/her a neb treatment (possibly more than once during the day) requires atleast 10-15 minutes and that takes time and attention from the others.

Other provider's may do it differently but that's my 2 cents.
As an infant only provider... nope, not coming back yet, especially with a nebulizer for a 6 month old; hell it was bad giving treatments to an 18 month old once in a blue moon, but a baby baby - not well enough to be in care yet. Every parent that has had an infant get RSV in my care has kept the child home at least a full week with no qualms
Reply
LysesKids 03:07 PM 02-13-2017
Originally Posted by daycare:
i agree with bc
i just had a 2.5 year old with it and she was out 8 full days, which included weekend. She came back last week and i sent the hold home for unable to participate.

Rsv is very contagious and dangerous for infants.
this!!!!
Reply
finsup 05:10 PM 02-13-2017
Nope, not happening. 6 months is so young, I wouldn't want to make the call of when to give it. My daughter needed a nebulizer a lot last winter and having to use it was scary at times. Not to mention time consuming. But yeah, kiddo would definitely be out until not needing the nebulizer anymore. I would just tell dcm that children need to be med free (including nebulizers) for 24 hours before returning to care.
Reply
EntropyControlSpecialist 12:59 PM 02-15-2017
Seems too scary to me. Babies 6 months and under seem to wind up in the hospital OFTEN for low oxygen levels. I wouldn't want to be in charge of the poor baby if she needed to go to the hospital immediately for low oxygen levels...she needs one on one care right now.
Reply
Tags:infant illness, respiratory illnesses, respiratory syncytial virus, rsv
Reply Up