From what I understand the provider called CAS first and then when the parents found out they pulled. Then she sued for money owed and then they counter sued. The parents were retaliating. Also, from what I remember in the transcripts the smoking was brought up by the family in court but never before that and the judged basically said since it wasn't an issue while they were in care and they continued to bring him he wasn't taking it into consideration. I honestly think there are still unanswered questions and the provider should have had better representation. With a real lawyer this whole thing could have played out differently.

Reply