Originally Posted by Blackcat31:
Just curious but why do you have the 48 hour exclusion?
Is the parent suppose to do anything in that 48 hours?
I get that you are trying to "curb" the biting but I guess I fail to see the logic in having them stay home for 48 hours unless something is suppose to happen in that timeframe.
NOT saying your policy is not good (it IS), I just didn't understand the point of exclusion other than as a punishment for the parent because their child bit someone... That's how I would take it if I were a parent anyways... 
Should I take that out and have strike three termination??
I guess it would give us time to think of anything else we can do.