Default Style Register
Daycare.com Forum
Daycare Center and Family Home Forum>Unionizing Daycare??
GretasLittleFriends 01:34 AM 04-15-2010
Have any of you heard about this?

http://stossel.blogs.foxbusiness.com...-unionization/

I was notified by another dc provider kind of near my area. She went on to say that if this passes, providers won't be allowed to take county/state subsidy children or be on the food program unless they're in the union.

Not sure how accurate this is. Its 3:40a, and I'm half asleep waiting for a dc girl to show up...
Reply
melskids 02:25 AM 04-15-2010
i'm in NY and yes, i have heard they are doing this. we are having a informational meeting / training on it soon... i did hear that it is going to raise our ratios by one child, so thats cool, and something about offering health insurance...but other than that, i dont know much about it yet. so i dont know if its gonna be a good thing or not.....
Reply
TGT09 05:00 AM 04-15-2010
I'm in Ohio and I have heard this as well. I do not take state children so it won't affect me but I did hear it.
Reply
GretasLittleFriends 06:01 AM 04-15-2010
I don't understand how we, as home daycare providers, can be forced into a union. We're independent contractors. Union members can and do strike. How do home daycare providers strike without doing time? When independent businesses group together and begin price fixing and market coercion and doing things like striking, the end up doing prison time because it's against federal law.

I don't like the way this sounds... It will affect me as I live in a very low income area and over half of my parents are on county subsidy.
Reply
Childminder 06:34 AM 04-15-2010
In Michigan we are forced to pay 1.15% of our state subsidy automatically to a union. It went in to effect Jan 09 and we did not get a vote, we just are a part of this union. UAW-Child Care Providers Together Unite. Local 7127.
Reply
jen 07:00 AM 04-15-2010
OMG... I am NOT going to be a happy camper if this happens. I don't have any subsidized children but there is no way that this is in any way constitutional. And, in my area, most providers won't take subsidy kids anyway...if they do this, low income people around here will NEVER be able to find a licensed provider willing to take them.
Reply
GretasLittleFriends 09:49 AM 04-15-2010
Originally Posted by Childminder:
In Michigan we are forced to pay 1.15% of our state subsidy automatically to a union. It went in to effect Jan 09 and we did not get a vote, we just are a part of this union. UAW-Child Care Providers Together Unite. Local 7127.
So, what do you get out of it? What does the union do for you? How does it benefit you?
Reply
MN Mom 10:32 AM 04-15-2010
Wow...just wow...

This blows my mind away! I'm not licensed, nor am I going to be doing care for more than my 1 family...but I feel for you guys.

Politics today are just crazy. I don't think its constitutional either, but a lot of things have happened in recent years / months that don't seem very constitutional.

I'm off today, so back to my book! (1984, by George Orwell--very good if you like books that raise questions on politics and policy)
Reply
momofsix 10:40 AM 04-15-2010
Originally Posted by Childminder:
In Michigan we are forced to pay 1.15% of our state subsidy automatically to a union. It went in to effect Jan 09 and we did not get a vote, we just are a part of this union. UAW-Child Care Providers Together Unite. Local 7127.
I no longer have state subsidy, but I do remember that when it went into effect they did send a paper I could have filled out to opt out of the union. Not sure if that was a one time deal or not. Supposedly they fight for higher wages, health insurance...but I nevere saw anything actually happen yet.
Reply
Childminder 11:42 AM 04-15-2010
Originally Posted by GretasLittleFriends:
So, what do you get out of it? What does the union do for you? How does it benefit you?
Supposedly they got us a raise in subsidy. It did go up a few cents but I have been going to figure it out because I think I pay more out in union dues than I got in raise. It's supposed to pay for collective bargaining and representation in negotiating contracts, blah, blah, blah.
Reply
Childminder 11:49 AM 04-15-2010
Originally Posted by momofsix:
I no longer have state subsidy, but I do remember that when it went into effect they did send a paper I could have filled out to opt out of the union. Not sure if that was a one time deal or not. Supposedly they fight for higher wages, health insurance...but I nevere saw anything actually happen yet.
It gave us an opt out for the automatic 1.15% but if you signified that you objected you then paid a service fee equal to 77.42% of Union dues or service fees. Being as I'm not a lawyer and do not understand most of the legaleeze and spend my time taking care of children I'm sure either way I'm being screwed.

Right now I don't have any state children so I don't pay.
Reply
booroo 12:17 PM 04-15-2010
WOW!! This is a big brother take over, BIG TIME.......Talk about socializm going into play. This is no way a good thing for any self employeed business owner, its scary to think that the State government is forcing these busineses to be in the union.
I truely hope that the appeal goes through, because there is no way this is legal, NO WAY!!!
Reply
grandmom 02:23 PM 04-15-2010
Washington State: We are not required to be members unless we take subsidy kids. Dues of not more than $50 per month come out of the state subsidy check.

Why we went to unions? Because the state was writing more and more invasive laws about what we could and couldn't do, like that they could "inspect" any part of our home. There was even talk of not allowing us a Christmas Tree in our home - because of the fire hazard. It was awful what they were trying to impose. They were not taking into account any of our requests. It was very one-sided.

Now, I've NEVER beleived in the union philosophies. And I'm way too conservative to support a lot of their ideas. But I was willing to join simply to make a statement to the state that they had crossed a line. Six years later the state is currently re-writing all the regulations again, and guess who's at the table? The union of course, but also providers, parents, and other stakeholders. The draft of the new regs looks very acceptable. Finally the state was put in a position of hearing us.
Reply
Chickenhauler 05:58 PM 04-15-2010
To call an independent business such as a daycare owner/operator a "union member" is in itself a crime.

It falls under the RICO Act due to it's price fixing/gouging, monopolistic control of the marketplace, and is punishable by $20k in fines and up to 25 years in prison per count.

Many RICO classified offenses apply here-extortion, bribery (if you wanna work, you gotta pay the thugs first) along with embezzlement of union funds (been a union member once upon a time, I can tell you they're all corrupt).

The union lying to you and saying that they bring the power of collective bargaining to the table is just that, a lie. The power of collective bargaining lies in the possibility of a workforce walkout/strike. As independent business persons, daycare providers cannot do this, it's called extortion. If you don't believe that, ask the air traffic controllers what Reagan did to them.

If you come in contact with a union salesman (that's what they are, they're trying to get you to buy into their product), ask them the hard questions....what are your strike benefits?
What kind of insurance is available?
What kind of pension plan do you have in place?
What is the paid holidays, and where does that pay come from?
What professional training programs do they have in place?
Will union representation be present at any and all disciplinary hearings and actions, and fight upon your behalf?
Will the union now become the go-between for provider and administrative authority when it comes to filing greivances?

If they answer NO or stammer to any of these questions, that says they're not looking out for you, but looking for a cash influx.


I see why the unions in MI pushed for this....they're now saddled with the retiree costs (UAW) and coupled with decreasing memberships (plant closings and cutbacks in production) they have to get their money from somewhere, so they're gonna steal it from you.
Reply
boysx5 04:49 AM 04-16-2010
I would be for a union if it helped us providers that were having issues and to make the regs eaiser seems to me the person who comes up with some of these have never had children or have done our job. I would be willing to pay a fee each year if I had someone to back me up. I feel that sometimes everyone thinks we sit around all day and do nothing.
Reply
MN Mom 05:03 AM 04-16-2010
Originally Posted by Chickenhauler:
To call an independent business such as a daycare owner/operator a "union member" is in itself a crime.

It falls under the RICO Act due to it's price fixing/gouging, monopolistic control of the marketplace, and is punishable by $20k in fines and up to 25 years in prison per count.

Many RICO classified offenses apply here-extortion, bribery (if you wanna work, you gotta pay the thugs first) along with embezzlement of union funds (been a union member once upon a time, I can tell you they're all corrupt).

The union lying to you and saying that they bring the power of collective bargaining to the table is just that, a lie. The power of collective bargaining lies in the possibility of a workforce walkout/strike. As independent business persons, daycare providers cannot do this, it's called extortion. If you don't believe that, ask the air traffic controllers what Reagan did to them.

If you come in contact with a union salesman (that's what they are, they're trying to get you to buy into their product), ask them the hard questions....what are your strike benefits?
What kind of insurance is available?
What kind of pension plan do you have in place?
What is the paid holidays, and where does that pay come from?
What professional training programs do they have in place?
Will union representation be present at any and all disciplinary hearings and actions, and fight upon your behalf?
Will the union now become the go-between for provider and administrative authority when it comes to filing greivances?

If they answer NO or stammer to any of these questions, that says they're not looking out for you, but looking for a cash influx.


I see why the unions in MI pushed for this....they're now saddled with the retiree costs (UAW) and coupled with decreasing memberships (plant closings and cutbacks in production) they have to get their money from somewhere, so they're gonna steal it from you.
I believe this is the same reason farmers cannot be unionized, no? If they went on "strike" the worlds food supply would be in serious jeopardy. Controlling the food supply could be too powerful a bargaining chip, one would think. Now, farm workers...I'm not so sure about. I'll have to ask my husband, as he farms with his parents, and they have employees...but I have never heard of them going on strike.

Since you seem to know a lot about unions, I figured you'd be the person to ask! Sorry for going off-topic!

I loathe Unions. They are partially the reason we have so many BAD teachers still on the payrolls of schools across the nation. It is simply too expensive (legally speaking) to fire the bad apples...even if they commit a crime. It's a serious problem in our country today. I was reading an article on FoxNews.com about how many teachers are still on the payrolls due to union intervention, strong-arming, that should NOT be there.
Reply
booroo 05:56 AM 04-16-2010
Originally Posted by MN Mom:
I believe this is the same reason farmers cannot be unionized, no? If they went on "strike" the worlds food supply would be in serious jeopardy. Controlling the food supply could be too powerful a bargaining chip, one would think. Now, farm workers...I'm not so sure about. I'll have to ask my husband, as he farms with his parents, and they have employees...but I have never heard of them going on strike.

Since you seem to know a lot about unions, I figured you'd be the person to ask! Sorry for going off-topic!

I loathe Unions. They are partially the reason we have so many BAD teachers still on the payrolls of schools across the nation. It is simply too expensive (legally speaking) to fire the bad apples...even if they commit a crime. It's a serious problem in our country today. I was reading an article on FoxNews.com about how many teachers are still on the payrolls due to union intervention, strong-arming, that should NOT be there.
As far as the farmers being a part of a Union NO, they can not, they are self employed. But employees can be, if they are willing to start one....Now most farms are not big enough nor do they employee enough people to have enough funds to buy into a Union. Plus most employees for Farms get what I call great under the table wages, that when counted into an actaully wage, would be a very fair wages. So Im not sure why they would.

As far as the teachers....Dont get me started.......My son was called stupid, dumb, ignorate, and be littled by a teacher when he was in the 2nd, that teacher is still teaching, and she is now teaching 1st graders.....We took our children out of that school and moved so that my younger 2 will not be subject to her, my one daughter was, and while she was not mean to her, she was mean to other students in the class that my daughter witnessed. She would come home crying.....When I went to the school board about the problem with my son......I was told that she does not remember saying any of those words to my son, even though 5 students came foward and said they heard her.....The adult teachers words was worth more than the students........Why cant we have a union for our students, there is there voice in all of this. This teacher was so scared of my son, being smarter than her, that she be littled him until he thought he was dumb.....Guess what, in next year straight As, and the next and the next and well the path continues he is in 7th grade and a honor roll student.
The union when to bat for her, she one present at all school board meeting, and whenever she was talked or question about her behavior.

UNIONS are not good for anything but pricing business out of business, look what they did for the automotive business. Automotive car prices reflect, that cost in a big way, over 40% of 1 car is to pay 1 employee of the company!!! Crazy.
Reply
MarinaVanessa 07:12 AM 04-16-2010
I havn't heard about Unions for daycare here in CA and all I can say is thank goodness. When I think about Unions all I can think about is how my fiance is in a union (for the county) and how one set of employees wanted more health benefits, which I thought was rediculous because the county has great health benefits with great doctors and great coverage which covers more than any other county in Southern CA. Well, the union wanted their members to strike. They were going to be FORCED to strike. When my fiance talked to his rep he was told that if he didn't strike that he would be fined per day that he worked instead of striked!! Um ... we have a mortgage, bills etc!! We can't afford to not work. He is not salary and if he does go on strike we simply do not get paid. Well, needless to say my fiance spoke to a few other employees (quite a few) that felt the same and would rather be fined the rediculous amount per day and at least get a paycheck rather than nothing and risk losing their homes. Everyone else thought that the benefits were fine, it was just this one unit. So in the end nothing ended up happening. Apparently it was one untit of 8 people against the rest of the building. It was rediculous.
Reply
childcare.mi 11:40 AM 04-16-2010
I am a group home provider in Michigan and have been forced into unionization against my wishes. A group of us have filed a class action Federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of this practice. This is a pure money grab on the part of the unions. They are currently making almost 4 million dollars a year on home providers union dues. If we were to win this case, it would be a win for all providers! There is a lot of mis-information out there. Please educate yourself and start with requesting a copy of your "union contract". You'll see that the union you are paying doesn't have any authority to do anything but lobby on your behalf. (That is one expensive lobbiest!) If you would like to read more about the pending lawsuit please read below. I've enclosed a copy of the news release by the National Right to Work Legal Foundation who is providing legal services.

Carrie


Michigan Home-Care Providers File Class-Action Suit Challenging Union Boss/Granholm Unionization Scheme

Right to Work Foundation attorneys challenge Governor and union boss collusion to force home-care providers under union control

Lansing, MI (February 17, 2010) – With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation attorneys, a group of Michigan home-based day-care providers have filed a class-action federal lawsuit against government union officials and Governor Granholm's Administration for illegally forcing them to pay union dues.

Carrie Schlaud and Diana Orr of Lapeer County, Edward and Nora Gross of Ingham County, and Peggy Mashke of Ogemaw County -- with assistance from the National Right to Work Foundation -- filed the federal suit today on behalf of all of Michigan’s 40,000 home-care providers.

The suit challenges a scheme created by Granholm, Michigan Department of Human Services (DHS) officials, and a union front group called "Child Care Providers Together Michigan" (CCPTM) to designate home-care providers who accept state assistance as "state employees" and foist CCPTM union political "representation" on them. CCPTM is an operation run by the United Autoworker (UAW) and American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSME) unions.

Under Granholm’s direction, DHS officials created the "Michigan Home Based Child Care Council" to provide the union bosses with an entity to deal with as the "management" of the home child-care providers. Even though only 15 percent of the 40,000 day-care providers voted in the union certification election, the CCPTM union hierarchy was granted monopoly bargaining privileges and political representation of all the home-care providers.

The DHS now siphons union dues from the providers' paychecks and forwards the money into the union bosses' bank accounts. Recent media reports suggest that in exchange for their special government-granted privileges to force Michigan's home-care providers under union monopoly control, the union bosses benefiting from this scheme contribute to various pro-compulsory unionism politicians in Michigan, including Governor Granholm.

The class-action suit challenges the forced-unionism scheme on the grounds that it violates the U.S. Constitution's guarantees of free political expression and association.

"This scheme is nothing more than pure political payback; union bosses funnel millions of dollars to the campaigns of pro-forced unionism politicians, and the same politicians are forcing home-care providers to pay tens of millions of dollars into union boss coffers," said Patrick Semmens, Legal Information Director of the National Right to Work Foundation.

The federal lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Southern Division.
Reply
Chickenhauler 12:37 PM 04-19-2010
Originally Posted by MN Mom:
I believe this is the same reason farmers cannot be unionized, no? If they went on "strike" the worlds food supply would be in serious jeopardy. Controlling the food supply could be too powerful a bargaining chip, one would think. Now, farm workers...I'm not so sure about. I'll have to ask my husband, as he farms with his parents, and they have employees...but I have never heard of them going on strike.

Since you seem to know a lot about unions, I figured you'd be the person to ask! Sorry for going off-topic!

I loathe Unions. They are partially the reason we have so many BAD teachers still on the payrolls of schools across the nation. It is simply too expensive (legally speaking) to fire the bad apples...even if they commit a crime. It's a serious problem in our country today. I was reading an article on FoxNews.com about how many teachers are still on the payrolls due to union intervention, strong-arming, that should NOT be there.
Nope, farmers can't create a union to influence their "workplace" aka "market price".

I own a long haul trucking company, and we went through all this a couple years ago when fuel was $5/gallon and we were spending $10k per month per truck on fuel.

Lots of guys were talking about going on strike, and the cooler heads (and wiser) pointed out that for independent truckers to group up and shut down like that, is a crime under the RICO acts of extortion.

Farm workers can organize a union and collectively bargain with the employer for better wages, benefits, vacation pay, etc. They can also go on strike if they don't get what they want. The farmer can also say "Bye bye, you're fired" to those who don't show up for work.

Maybe I'm a greedy guy, but I always ask "What's in it for me?"
Reply
Chickenhauler 12:40 PM 04-19-2010
Originally Posted by childcare.mi:
I am a group home provider in Michigan and have been forced into unionization against my wishes. A group of us have filed a class action Federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of this practice. This is a pure money grab on the part of the unions. They are currently making almost 4 million dollars a year on home providers union dues. If we were to win this case, it would be a win for all providers! There is a lot of mis-information out there. Please educate yourself and start with requesting a copy of your "union contract". You'll see that the union you are paying doesn't have any authority to do anything but lobby on your behalf. (That is one expensive lobbiest!) If you would like to read more about the pending lawsuit please read below. I've enclosed a copy of the news release by the National Right to Work Legal Foundation who is providing legal services.

Carrie


Michigan Home-Care Providers File Class-Action Suit Challenging Union Boss/Granholm Unionization Scheme

Right to Work Foundation attorneys challenge Governor and union boss collusion to force home-care providers under union control

Lansing, MI (February 17, 2010) – With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation attorneys, a group of Michigan home-based day-care providers have filed a class-action federal lawsuit against government union officials and Governor Granholm's Administration for illegally forcing them to pay union dues.

Carrie Schlaud and Diana Orr of Lapeer County, Edward and Nora Gross of Ingham County, and Peggy Mashke of Ogemaw County -- with assistance from the National Right to Work Foundation -- filed the federal suit today on behalf of all of Michigan’s 40,000 home-care providers.

The suit challenges a scheme created by Granholm, Michigan Department of Human Services (DHS) officials, and a union front group called "Child Care Providers Together Michigan" (CCPTM) to designate home-care providers who accept state assistance as "state employees" and foist CCPTM union political "representation" on them. CCPTM is an operation run by the United Autoworker (UAW) and American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSME) unions.

Under Granholm’s direction, DHS officials created the "Michigan Home Based Child Care Council" to provide the union bosses with an entity to deal with as the "management" of the home child-care providers. Even though only 15 percent of the 40,000 day-care providers voted in the union certification election, the CCPTM union hierarchy was granted monopoly bargaining privileges and political representation of all the home-care providers.

The DHS now siphons union dues from the providers' paychecks and forwards the money into the union bosses' bank accounts. Recent media reports suggest that in exchange for their special government-granted privileges to force Michigan's home-care providers under union monopoly control, the union bosses benefiting from this scheme contribute to various pro-compulsory unionism politicians in Michigan, including Governor Granholm.

The class-action suit challenges the forced-unionism scheme on the grounds that it violates the U.S. Constitution's guarantees of free political expression and association.

"This scheme is nothing more than pure political payback; union bosses funnel millions of dollars to the campaigns of pro-forced unionism politicians, and the same politicians are forcing home-care providers to pay tens of millions of dollars into union boss coffers," said Patrick Semmens, Legal Information Director of the National Right to Work Foundation.

The federal lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Southern Division.
Good for you guys, keep us updated.

In the meantime, bankrupt the union. Show up to the union hall with every daycare kid in tow (keep them up from their naps prior) for every union meeting, file a grievance over every little petty minute thing, and generally, be a royal PITA. Repeatedly request literature that you are entitled to under the law, daily if you remember to do so. Make them spend 10x's your dues in paper, toner and postage. Any pre-paid postage envelopes you get from them, cram it full of your junk mail and send it back....they gotta pay that postage, the heavier, the more expensive it is for them.

Make them wish they never thought of this 'let's steal money from people who don't even want us around' tactic.
Reply
Childminder 01:59 PM 04-19-2010
Here is another 'good one' from our Mi union. Saturday I received a candidates election form that we are to select up to seven candidates and return for elections by April 26. I don't have any knowledge of any of the candidates so I went on the internet to see if there is any info to educate myself about them. The first one I found was a FBI lawyer, whatever, the second one I found was convicted of utility fraud. Oh yeah, and the best one is Tammy.....no last name....just Tammy. WTF?
Reply
childcare.mi 07:04 PM 04-19-2010
Amazing!! The thing is...I can't even get "my union" to answer the phone, return calls OR send me ANY information. All the union does for me, is collect my union dues! I'll keep you posted. Watch the news...I'm sure there will be more information in the media too.

Carrie
Reply
MyKids 10:46 PM 04-19-2010
This union is robbing us. I agree with all of the posts. How do I make sure I am a part of the fight?
Reply
Childminder 07:11 AM 04-20-2010
[quote=childcare.mi;25829]I am a group home provider in Michigan and have been forced into unionization against my wishes. A group of us have filed a class action Federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of this practice. This is a pure money grab on the part of the unions. They are currently making almost 4 million dollars a year on home providers union dues. If we were to win this case, it would be a win for all providers! There is a lot of mis-information out there. Please educate yourself and start with requesting a copy of your "union contract". You'll see that the union you are paying doesn't have any authority to do anything but lobby on your behalf. (That is one expensive lobbiest!) If you would like to read more about the pending lawsuit please read below. I've enclosed a copy of the news release by the National Right to Work Legal Foundation who is providing legal services.

Carrie
QUOTE]

Carrie, I'm in Waterford so not far from you. I would like more information about the lawsuit and if you would like to give me some resources you could PM me. I'm am not in favor of paying these 'lobbyists' for nothing.
Reply
Unregistered 05:05 AM 05-27-2010
Originally Posted by boysx5:
I would be for a union if it helped us providers that were having issues and to make the regs eaiser seems to me the person who comes up with some of these have never had children or have done our job. I would be willing to pay a fee each year if I had someone to back me up. I feel that sometimes everyone thinks we sit around all day and do nothing.

The Union has provided help to numerous providers with getting there paychecks, talking to dhs on their behalf and setting up hearings and going with them on there behalf. They also call providers to make sure that they have had their training or remind them to schedule training so they can continue providing care. There is a hotline # you can call to get help.
Reply
Unregistered 10:57 AM 05-28-2010
I would like to say that the CCPTM contacts for the chlild care union have also been providers and have been in the situations where they wished they would of had a union to turn to . They are just like you and they are looking out for you and want to help.
Reply
jen 11:39 AM 05-28-2010
Originally Posted by Unregistered:
I would like to say that the CCPTM contacts for the chlild care union have also been providers and have been in the situations where they wished they would of had a union to turn to . They are just like you and they are looking out for you and want to help.
Your opinions would carry more weight if you registered....
Reply
MarinaVanessa 12:57 PM 05-28-2010
Originally Posted by Unregistered:
I would like to say that the CCPTM contacts for the chlild care union have also been providers and have been in the situations where they wished they would of had a union to turn to . They are just like you and they are looking out for you and want to help.
I think more people would be open to do more research and finding out more about what a union could do for them if the weren't being forced to join. Looks to me like providers have no choice and have to do it. I don't think that it's right and I can't think of anything that I needed help for in daycare that only a union could help me with. I'm sure that there are some situations where a provider could find themself needing help with legal issues or other situations but a lawyer could easily help me with that and I only need to pay a lawyer his fee when I need his services and not on a regular bases even when I don't need him.
Reply
professionalmom 01:03 PM 05-28-2010
Yep - forced union! I got the list of candidates and could not find anything of significance on any of them. I do not remember getting an "opt-out" letter.

Oh, and about higher wages - HA! HA! HA! I was getting $3.11 per hour per child under age 2 1/2 years (with the incentive for under 2 1/2). Now I get $2.60 per hour for that same age child. I used to get $2.90 per hour per child over 2 1/2 years. Now I get $2.40 per hour per child over age 2 1/2 years. That's a $0.50 - 0.51 DECREASE in wages. Now, try to go to the parents and ask for a higher copay because DHS has lowered their reimbursement amount. Add the union dues on top of it and in MY county, we have lost BIG! I have actually LOST CLIENTS because they could not afford to make up that difference, which was not MY fault. If I don't have the clients make up the difference that would be a loss of $20 per week per child! If I have 4 DCKs on subsidy, that's an $80 per week loss in income ($4160 loss per year)!!

Health Insurance - I can't get any info on that either.

This union has totally screwed all of us in this county.
Reply
MarinaVanessa 01:29 PM 05-28-2010
Originally Posted by professionalmom:

This union has totally screwed all of us in this county.
And this why I'm thankful that CA is not doing this. The only thing that CA is thinking of enforcing is education in the child development field which I agree with and already do without being forced to do. I'm just sorry that you providers that are forced to the union have to go through it and deal with the lesser pay and union dues. If you all didn't accept subsidy as payment would you still have to pay your dues? What would happen if you didn't?
Reply
professionalmom 01:51 PM 05-28-2010
Originally Posted by MarinaVanessa:
If you all didn't accept subsidy as payment would you still have to pay your dues? What would happen if you didn't?
No, we would not have to pay the dues if we don't accept subsidy clients. So it could be argued that we can boycott the union dues by not accepting subsidy clients. However, most of us would be out of business in a matter of days. Here's why: in my county (per the numbers my food program rep showed me), every public school in this area (county) has more than 50% of it's students on free or reduced lunch programs. Some were as high as 95%!! Most of these kids are in families that qualify for DHS assistance.
Over 80% of my clients (over the past 2 years) had DHS daycare subsidy. If you don't take the subsidy clients, you WILL be out of business. Period. I don't feel like I have a choice. I have to take subsidy clients just to stay open, therefore, I HAVE to pay to be in a union I never wanted in the first place and which has done nothing to help me, except lower my reimbursement rate and lost me clients.
Reply
Chickenhauler 12:58 AM 05-30-2010
Originally Posted by Unregistered:
The Union has provided help to numerous providers with getting there paychecks, talking to dhs on their behalf and setting up hearings and going with them on there behalf. They also call providers to make sure that they have had their training or remind them to schedule training so they can continue providing care. There is a hotline # you can call to get help.

Originally Posted by Unregistered:
I would like to say that the CCPTM contacts for the chlild care union have also been providers and have been in the situations where they wished they would of had a union to turn to . They are just like you and they are looking out for you and want to help.
The union is looking out for their own pockets, plain and simple.

If it was such a great thing, they wouldn't have to FORCE themselves upon private business's. People would be flocking to sign up in droves.
Reply
Chickenhauler 01:00 AM 05-30-2010
Originally Posted by professionalmom:
No, we would not have to pay the dues if we don't accept subsidy clients. So it could be argued that we can boycott the union dues by not accepting subsidy clients. However, most of us would be out of business in a matter of days. Here's why: in my county (per the numbers my food program rep showed me), every public school in this area (county) has more than 50% of it's students on free or reduced lunch programs. Some were as high as 95%!! Most of these kids are in families that qualify for DHS assistance.
Over 80% of my clients (over the past 2 years) had DHS daycare subsidy. If you don't take the subsidy clients, you WILL be out of business. Period. I don't feel like I have a choice. I have to take subsidy clients just to stay open, therefore, I HAVE to pay to be in a union I never wanted in the first place and which has done nothing to help me, except lower my reimbursement rate and lost me clients.
Essentially, the way this pans out is the taxpayers of MI are (in)directly paying money straight into the union halls coffers.
Reply
professionalmom 05:27 AM 05-30-2010
Originally Posted by Chickenhauler:
Essentially, the way this pans out is the taxpayers of MI are (in)directly paying money straight into the union halls coffers.
Exactly. The only way the union gets their dues from us (the providers) is if and when we take subsidy payments for low income families. Then we get a check from the state (funded by the taxpayers of MI, including us - the providers). The union then siphons off a percentage of that subsidy (taxpayer funds) to pay the dues for the union.

I wasn't even thinking about that part. Thanks Chickenhauler!!

What I want to know is, how is this all fair? Let take 2 providers for example: 1 takes subsidy clients and 1 does not. Supposedly both are in the union because all providers in MI are now unionized. However, only the one taking subsidy clients has to pay dues. How can both get the same benefits, yet only one is paying for it?
Reply
Chickenhauler 12:13 PM 05-30-2010
Originally Posted by professionalmom:
Exactly. The only way the union gets their dues from us (the providers) is if and when we take subsidy payments for low income families. Then we get a check from the state (funded by the taxpayers of MI, including us - the providers). The union then siphons off a percentage of that subsidy (taxpayer funds) to pay the dues for the union.

I wasn't even thinking about that part. Thanks Chickenhauler!!

What I want to know is, how is this all fair? Let take 2 providers for example: 1 takes subsidy clients and 1 does not. Supposedly both are in the union because all providers in MI are now unionized. However, only the one taking subsidy clients has to pay dues. How can both get the same benefits, yet only one is paying for it?
Socialism, that's how.

That reminds me of the joke "Welcome to the Republican Party"


I was talking to a friend's little girl, and she said she wanted to be
President some day.

Both of her parents, liberal Democrats, were standing there, so I asked
her,

'If you were to be the President, what's the first thing you would do?'
She replied, 'I'd give food and houses to all the homeless people.'

'Wow - what a worthy goal.' I told her, 'You don't have to wait until
you're President to do that.

You can come over to my house and mow the grass, pull weeds, and sweep my
yard, and I'll pay you $50. Then I'll take you over to the grocery store
where the homeless guy hangs out, and you can give him the $50 to use
toward food or a new house.'

She thought that over for a few seconds, 'cause she's only 6.

And while her Mom glared at me, the little girl looked me straight in the
eye and asked, 'Why doesn't the homeless guy come over and do the work,
and you can just pay him the $50?'

And I said, 'Welcome to the Republican Party.'



Have any of you contacted your state representative? Maybe get a handful together from the same area (rep) and make an appt to meet in person with them with facts and figures in hand?

Maybe get ahold of the local TV station, one that does the "looking out for you" segments or the like?
Reply
MarinaVanessa 04:11 PM 05-30-2010
Originally Posted by Chickenhauler:

And I said, 'Welcome to the Republican Party.
Well said, I love it.
Reply
judytrickett 09:40 AM 06-01-2010
I hate unions. ALL Unions. It's akin to legal blackmail IMO.
Reply
professionalmom 10:08 AM 06-01-2010
Originally Posted by Chickenhauler:
Maybe get ahold of the local TV station, one that does the "looking out for you" segments or the like?
Chickenhauler, I really, really LOVE your comments and posts. The "Welcome to the Republican Party" is AWESOME.

As for the part of your post that I quoted above, don't make me laugh! I know you are out working very hard and probably do not get to watch tv very much (especially the news), but here's a news flash for you - they are almost all bent toward "looking out for" the liberal agendas. Therefore, they are pro-union (usually) and will laugh us off or they twist it around to paint us as rich people who are complaining that we are not rich enough! If you are a liberal democrat and you complain, you are a victim. If you are a conservative republican and you complain, you are greedy and selfish. The media is always pandering to this ideology.
Reply
fctjc1979 10:14 AM 06-01-2010
Originally Posted by professionalmom:
Chickenhauler, I really, really LOVE your comments and posts. The "Welcome to the Republican Party" is AWESOME.

As for the part of your post that I quoted above, don't make me laugh! I know you are out working very hard and probably do not get to watch tv very much (especially the news), but here's a news flash for you - they are almost all bent toward "looking out for" the liberal agendas. Therefore, they are pro-union (usually) and will laugh us off or they twist it around to paint us as rich people who are complaining that we are not rich enough! If you are a liberal democrat and you complain, you are a victim. If you are a conservative republican and you complain, you are greedy and selfish. The media is always pandering to this ideology.
Too true!! I'm not sure there really is any completely impartial news organization anymore.
Reply
Tags:child care unionization, michigan, union
Reply Up